Dassault Systèmes licenses CATIA, SOLIDWORKS, ENOVIA, SIMULIA and the 3DEXPERIENCE platform mainly through DSLS-served concurrent (network) and named-user licences, so your compliance position turns on how floating tokens are checked out and reconciled against entitlement. Below are independent firms that build a Dassault effective licence position, listed alphabetically with balanced pros and cons.
Published 10 October 2025 · Last reviewed 10 October 2025 · Reviewed quarterly · A directory, not a ranking
Dassault Systèmes licenses its design and PLM portfolio — CATIA, SOLIDWORKS, ENOVIA, DELMIA, SIMULIA and the 3DEXPERIENCE platform — through the DSLS (Dassault Systèmes License Server) using a mix of concurrent (network/floating) trigrams, named users and, on 3DEXPERIENCE, role-based and credit-style entitlements. Exposure is driven by how many of which roles are checked out at peak, home-use and offline borrowing, version upgrades that change the entitlement mapping, and SOLIDWORKS serial-number activations that drift across machines.
A compliance assessment, or effective licence position (ELP), reconciles your contractual entitlements against the DSLS usage logs and installed-base data: it counts concurrent peaks per trigram, identifies named-user roles assigned but unused, flags offline-borrow and home-use against contract terms, and maps the 3DEXPERIENCE role bundle to what people actually do. The output is a defensible position you hold before Dassault asks for one.
The firms below work buyer-side. They reconcile entitlement to deployment, quantify any gap and the options to close it, and prepare the evidence so that if a formal review arrives, the numbers are already yours rather than the vendor's. Independence matters here: the firm building your position should not also be selling you the licences.
Listed in neutral alphabetical order with balanced pros and cons — a directory, not a ranking.
Central- and Eastern-European SAM and audit-support boutique with its own SAM tooling, covering Adobe, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and VMware.
Independent multi-vendor licensing practice covering IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and Tier-2 publishers, with a stated 100% impartial, buyer-side model.
Canada-native independent boutique combining audit defense with data-driven license optimization across IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, Adobe and VMware.
Buyer-side independent licensing advisory with one of the broadest multi-vendor footprints, covering Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, Broadcom, Salesforce, ServiceNow and Workday.
Independent boutique covering Oracle, Microsoft, IBM, Quest, VMware, Red Hat and SAP across audit defense, negotiation and optimization.
Firms are listed alphabetically, never ranked. Independence is shown as a pro; a reseller, Big-Four or vendor-side audit relationship is shown as a con — each a factual trade-off for you to weigh.
Indicative only — the levers that shape the number, not a promise of any specific result.
Typical levers include reclaiming named-user roles that are assigned but never used, right-sizing concurrent trigram pools to true peak concurrency rather than a worst-case headcount, resolving offline-borrow and home-use exposure before it is counted against you, and cleaning up stale SOLIDWORKS activations. Indicative only: actual outcomes depend on your role mix, the DSLS configuration and your specific contract — this is not a promise of any particular result.
The vendor hub, adjacent services, and the same service for other publishers.
Direct answers to the questions Dassault Systèmes buyers ask most.
It is a reconciliation of what you are entitled to against what you actually deploy and consume on the DSLS server — concurrent peaks, named-user roles and 3DEXPERIENCE entitlements. The result is a single defensible view of your compliance gap, or surplus, that you control before any vendor review.
Mostly through DSLS-served concurrent (floating) licences counted at peak check-out, plus named users and role-based 3DEXPERIENCE entitlements. Because consumption is metered by the licence server, your own DSLS logs are the primary evidence in any assessment.
No. A buyer-side assessment is private to you. Its purpose is the opposite — to find and resolve exposure on your terms, so that if Dassault later requests a review you are negotiating from a position you already understand.
The firms below are listed as independents working buyer-side; independence is shown as a pro. Any reseller, vendor partnership or vendor-side audit relationship is shown as a con on the firm's row. This is a directory, not a ranking.
Neutral alphabetical order. This is a directory, not a ranking. Every firm carries balanced pros and cons and no firm is recommended over another.
No. Matching is free and confidential for buyers. We publish no fees and take no money from software publishers. Firms scope and quote the assessment with you directly.
Get matched, free and confidentially, with independent firms that build a Dassault effective licence position. Tell us your products and DSLS setup; we route your brief to firms that do this work.
Our weekly dispatch on vendor audit programs, regional developments and one buyer move. Subscribe to The Licensing Radar.